Breaking the silence: Does an mRNA vaccine harm outweigh the benefits? | Spectator Australia

As someone who has long questioned the safety and efficacy of Covid injections, I’ve pondered why more doctors aren’t expressing concerns, why so many seem unaware of the documented side effects, and why so few are sounding the alarm.

To help me answer this question, I spoke with renowned British cardiologist and heart health activist Dr. Asim Malhotra who broke the silence.

Malhotra was originally supportive of the programme, until a series of events led him to dig into the evidence. What he discovered alarmed him and resulted in his publication two Evidence-based, peer-reviewed Leaves Along with a call for immediate suspension of spreading Covid mRNA. He tells his story:

Despite being one of the biggest critics of drugs, I never expected or imagined the possibility that these vaccines, these new vaccines, could cause harm. So very early on, I was one of the first to get two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, and I helped out at the vaccine center in January 2021. About a month later I had a conversation with a friend of mine, film director Gurinder Chadha (who was) vaccine reluctant. I said to her, “Listen, traditional vaccines are still one of the safest pharmacological interventions in the history of medicine. That doesn’t mean that all vaccines are out there.” in full Safe. No drug is completely safe. But when compared to other drug interventions that I’ve talked about and campaigned on, say, diabetes medications or blood pressure pills or statins, they’re much safer. “

Malhotra further elaborates his point of view through a Good morning Britain interview.

I said, “There are reasonable fears of vaccine hesitancy and irrational fears. Reasonable concerns are when you look at what the pharmaceutical industry has done for years – they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions – and prescription drugs are the third most common cause of death after heart disease and cancer.” So, I was open, and I felt empathy for people who were reluctant to get vaccinated. And I said, “In my opinion, as things stand at the moment, the conventional vaccines are the safest.”

Six months later, my father suffered an unexplained cardiac arrest. The autopsy made no sense, he was a very fit man, yet he had severe stenosis in two of his coronary arteries. I knew his heart-to-heart history inside out, and we both filmed for him a few years ago. I found myself thinking “Wait a minute, he’s developed rapid progression of coronary artery disease when he’s doing well during lockdown, walks 10,000 steps a day and eats well. for any other reason.”

Over the following months, emerging data leads Malhotra to question whether the vaccine was related to his father’s death. The first was an abstract published in Rotation (November 8, 2021) By US Cardiac Surgeon, Dr. Steven Gundry, who has followed up on several hundred of his patients after mRNA vaccination (Moderna/Pfizer). Gendry found that inflammatory markers associated with heart disease risk were overblown. On average, this change increased these people’s risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next five years, from 11 percent to 25 percent. This increase in risk particle.

The next event raised more alarm bells for Malhotra.

Within two weeks of this summary, a whistleblower from the most prestigious institution in the country approached me and said that a group of researchers By mistake It has been found through imaging studies that mRNA vaccines increase the risk of heart attacks through inflammation, but the lead researcher said they will not publish these findings because it could affect funding from the drugs.

Then I felt a duty and called GB News saying, “There Rotation abstract but also something else I’ve heard,” and she continually talked about it GB news. That interview went viral…with me asking questions and saying, “We need to investigate this.”

The resistance was strong.

‘One of the most respected medical bodies to which I belong has received a number of anonymous complaints from doctors that I was bringing a reputation to the medical profession and, by being in a relationship with them, I was bringing their reputation into disrepute. Then I was asked to respond formally. Malhotra replied and sounded a warning.

This experience made him realize how difficult it is to expose things publicly, so he decides to critically evaluate the evidence himself.

When I broke down the data, it became very clear that the harms of the mRNA vaccine greatly outweigh the benefits. It wasn’t even close! This is based on the highest quality data we will ever have.

The evidence comes from the original double-blind randomized control trials, which led to approval by regulators around the world of Pfizer and Moderna. Malhotra explains, ‘In a re-analysis Essentially from the original experiences with the Wuhan strain, leading scientists have found that you are more likely to suffer from a serious adverse event – for example hospitalization, disability or a life-altering event – than you are to be hospitalized with Covid. This means, in essence, that an mRNA vaccine should be a likely candidate Start It is approved for anyone in the first place.

continued:

Data from a randomized controlled trial showed a risk of serious adverse events of at least 1 in 800 within 2 months. It’s likely to be much higher as you get older because one of the mechanisms is accelerated heart disease. My father died six months after the second dose of the vaccine, and many people will die and have heart attacks months after receiving the vaccine because it accelerates coronary artery disease. But other vaccines have been withdrawn at a much lower cost: swine flu vaccine Withdrawn in 1976 after bouts of Guillain-Barre syndrome at a rate of 1/100,000; rota The vaccine was withdrawn in 1999 for causing a form of intestinal obstruction (intussusception) in 1/10,000; This is 1/800 at least. So, it’s a no-brainer. The question is: why didn’t they pull it off? Some say, “It was a permission for emergency use.” Well, it’s not an emergency anymore.

This begs the question, if the evidence is now So Is it clear why the silence continues? Well, I’m glad you asked. In a follow-up article I’ll explore the factors that contribute to the Great Silence—hint, it’s not just AHPRA—and how we can go from here.

Encouragingly, if the recent events are to pass, the silence is (slowly) being broken. The past few weeks have seen doctors appearing on mainstream media to express safety concerns, including in Australia Dr. Keren Phelpsdropping Malhotra’s final truth bomb live BBC The broadcast received millions of views on Twitter. Thanks Which color.

Other eminent people joined them Masters And the doctors sound the alarm and call on governments to “Stop the shots“.

Dr. Julie Sladen has a passion for transparency in healthcare. If you want to support her caffeine-inspired writing, you can give a shout out to her coffee drinker here.


#Breaking #silence #mRNA #vaccine #harm #outweigh #benefits #Spectator #Australia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *